UNDERWRITING & RISK CONTROLS

Our underwriting philosophy is capital preservation first, yield second, upside third.
Each opportunity is evaluated through a standardized normalization and stress-tested modeling framework before capital alignment.

Platform Overview → Investment Strategy → Underwriting Framework → U.S. Pipeline → Capital Alignment

NOI Normalization Methodology

We do not rely on broker-provided pro forma projections.

Each asset is underwritten using:

A. Trailing 12–24 Month Financial Review

  • Revenue segmentation (room, F&B, events, ancillary)

  • Expense ratio benchmarking vs comparable assets

  • Identification of non-recurring income

  • Identification of owner-specific expenses

B. Expense Normalization

  • Market-based payroll adjustments

  • Management fee inclusion (even if owner-operated)

  • Replacement reserves provision (2–4% of revenue depending on asset class)

  • Property tax reassessment where applicable

Adjusted / Normalized NOI reflecting true operating performance under institutional management.

Revenue Stress Testing

Each asset undergoes downside sensitivity modeling prior to capital structuring.

Standard stress scenarios include:

  • 10% Revenue Reduction

  • 20% Revenue Reduction

  • ADR compression scenario (hospitality assets)

  • Occupancy volatility stress case

We evaluate:

  • DSCR impact

  • Break-even occupancy threshold

  • Fixed vs variable cost elasticity

  • Liquidity runway under stress

Capital is structured only if debt service coverage remains defensible under stress.

CapEx Separation Framework

All capital expenditures are segmented into:

A. Maintenance CapEx

  • Life-safety

  • Deferred maintenance

  • Brand compliance

  • Structural preservation

B. Value-Add CapEx

  • ADR expansion initiatives

  • Repositioning enhancements

  • Amenity upgrades

  • Revenue-generating expansions

Maintenance CapEx is excluded from return projections.
Value-add CapEx must demonstrate measurable yield-on-cost.

Debt Sizing Logic

Debt is structured conservatively using the lesser of:

  • Target LTV thresholds

  • DSCR-based sizing

  • Stress-tested DSCR scenario

  • Market cap rate compression risk

Standard Guardrails:

  • DSCR ≥ 1.30–1.40 at stabilization

  • Sensitized DSCR ≥ 1.15 under stress case

  • Senior LTV typically ≤ 60–65% (asset dependent)

We underwrite to the lender’s credit committee standards before engagement.

Stabilization Assumptions

Stabilization is defined as:

  • Sustainable occupancy level consistent with market comps

  • Normalized expense ratios

  • Fully implemented operational efficiencies

  • CapEx program completed

  • Minimum 6–12 months consistent performance

No “Day 1 pro forma stabilization” assumptions are used.

Stabilized NOI must be supported by operational evidence.

Capital Stack & Sensitivity Model

Every acquisition flows through the same modeling sequence:

Acquisition NOI

Normalized NOI

Stabilized NOI

Debt Capacity (DSCR & LTV constrained)

Equity Requirement

Return Sensitivity (Base / Stress / Upside)

IRR & Exit Sensitivity Analysis

Return projections are evaluated under:

  • Base case cap rate

  • +50bps cap rate expansion

  • +100bps cap rate expansion

  • Exit multiple compression scenario

Equity is committed only where returns remain defensible under conservative exit assumptions.

Risk Mitigation Principles

We prioritize:

  • Fixed-rate or rate-capped debt where appropriate

  • Sponsor-aligned equity structures

  • Limited reliance on aggressive terminal values

  • Operating margin improvement before leverage expansion

Closing

Our underwriting framework is designed to ensure that capital partners are protected on the downside while retaining disciplined upside participation through operational execution.

Review U.S. Pipeline Development Strategy →

Geographic focus, broker network development, and relationship-based sourcing model.

Charl Hattingh | Managing Partner
Capital Partnerships & Acquisition Mandates